The characters in Imitation
are interesting, and yet true characters, and there is a great deal of mystery
surrounding them. How exactly they met, what Andrew did to get his
money, what he thought of the woman, are questions that are never answered in the story and I
think that works for this. It comes across to me like the woman is
inexperienced in the world and does not really know how to survive, so it makes
sense she would go back to a man’s place that she did not know and allow him to
paint her naked when he didn’t even know her name. So the audience shouldn’t
know too much information because our protagonist does not know that much
either.
One thing I noticed is that
because there is a great deal of dialogue the story resembles a play. I’m not
saying that’s bad, I love reading plays myself, but if you wanted to stay clear
of that medium you might want to think about breaking up the dialogue with more
action or description. She asks, “We’re taking off now?” but what is she
thinking? Doing? What is her body language saying, or his body language? This
could make the image of the story more complete and rely less on dialogue.
No comments:
Post a Comment